Shots in Zingst: driver acquitted – who was the real shooter?

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

The trial of two men being shot ends in the acquittal of a 24-year-old in Zingst; new investigations are imminent.

Im Freispruch eines 24-Jährigen in Zingst endet der Prozess zu Schüssen auf zwei Männer; neue Ermittlungen stehen bevor.
The trial of two men being shot ends in the acquittal of a 24-year-old in Zingst; new investigations are imminent.

Shots in Zingst: driver acquitted – who was the real shooter?

Today a preliminary conclusion will be drawn in a shocking case of gun violence in Zingst. On August 9, 2024, there was a confrontation between two security companies on the pier forecourt, which made for an unforgettable holiday event. Two men from Demmin were seriously injured when shots were fired from a car. The Stralsund regional court has now acquitted a 24-year-old defendant who was believed to be the driver of the car. This is reported by Nordkurier, which followed the process closely.

The charge of attempted murder could not be proven, which led to his acquittal. The prosecution and defense agreed: The driver could not have fired specifically at the injured parties. The judge, Ulla Riedelsheimer, emphasized that there was insufficient evidence that the defendant fired the shots. However, the matter is not quite over yet, as a new trial against another suspect is on the horizon, reports the Tagesschau.

The shocking events occurred during the high season, when numerous guests were on the Zingster pier forecourt. The men concerned, a 25-year-old and his 26-year-old companion, appeared as co-plaintiffs and applied for five-figure compensation. According to reports, a dispute broke out between the security companies after the 24-year-old and his friends set up their own company after resigning from their competitors. The injured party is said to have viewed this as a threat and the situation escalated.

Contradictions and unclear guilt

During the trial there were some significant contradictions among the witnesses. Two people identified the defendant as the shooter, but an acquaintance sitting in the back seat claimed the passenger was the real shooter. Surprisingly, the passenger refused to make any statement in court. Judge Riedelsheimer concluded that the passenger who allegedly carried out the attacks could not be held accountable. This could influence the upcoming investigations.

The Zingst incident is part of a larger problem in Germany: violent crime accounts for less than 4% of crimes recorded by the police, but has a significant impact on people's sense of security, as Statista reports. The number of violent crimes rose to around 217,000 in 2024, the highest rate since 2007, which is certainly fueling the public debate about security and willingness to use violence. The causes are varied and range from social tensions to psychological stress. In particular, acts of violence against emergency services have reached record levels and reflect a worrying development in society.

Now it remains to be seen how the public prosecutor's office will react to the verdict and whether a new trial will be initiated against the passenger. There is a possibility that further investigations will follow and public attention remains focused on what happened in Zingst. The weapon used in this incident has still not been found, further complicating the situation.

In Zingst, which is primarily known as a holiday region, this incident tragically illustrates that the dark side of life can shine through even in the most beautiful places. While discussions about the legal action and societal implications continue, those affected can only hope that justice takes its course and such incidents are prevented in the future.