Suche
Mein Konto
Security chief in Anklam: acquittal causes excitement after beating attack
A security chief is accused of serious assault and bodily harm in Anklam. The district court's acquittal provides legal remedies.
Security chief in Anklam: acquittal causes excitement after beating attack
In the small town of Anklam, an incident from 2021 is causing excitement and heated discussions. The 29-year-old head of security at a dance hall is accused of attacking a 37-year-old man with a powerful punch, leaving him nearly blind in one eye. The matter is now getting serious: The Neubrandenburg public prosecutor's office has filed an appeal against the acquittal of the Pasewalk district court, after which the defendant escaped without punishment. SVZ reports, that the court justified the acquittal by saying that there was a lack of evidence and it was unclear whether the security chief acted in a self-defense situation.
The incident that ultimately led to this legal dispute happened on November 21, 2021 in front of the dance hall. Witnesses reported that the injured party was in the bar with his friends when they met a seriously injured acquaintance who stated that he had been attacked by the defendant. When they returned to the disco, there was a heated argument between the group and the security guards. The security chief who admitted the blow claimed he had acted in self-defense.
Legal disagreements
The public prosecutor's office demanded a prison sentence of one year and eight months, which should be suspended, as well as a fine. But the district court rejected these claims because there was no credible witness testimony that could refute the defendant's claim of self-defense. In this context, it is important to understand the basics of self-defense, which are deeply anchored in German criminal law. Loud jurainindividual Acts of self-defense have strict requirements: there must be a current and unlawful attack, and the defense must actually be necessary.
In order to be considered self-defense, as stated in Section 32 of the Criminal Code, there must be an unlawful attack on a legally protected property. In addition, the person affected must react in an objectively necessary manner - this means that the action must represent the mildest means of defense. If the court concludes that the security chief's defense was justified, this could have far-reaching consequences for the injured party and his or her fate.
The consequences of the dispute
Unfortunately, the situation for the victim of the attack is anything but rosy. Since the incident, he has suffered a significant reduction in his quality of life as he is almost blind in one eye and his health is expected to continue to deteriorate. These are headlines that highlight not only legal aspects, but also human aspects.
The decision as to whether the district court's judgment should be challenged now depends on the written reasons for the judgment. It remains to be seen what the further legal steps will be and whether the issue of self-defense will be examined intensively again. Ultimately, it is not only the law enforcement authorities who are acting, but also the citizens of the city of Anklam, who have to deal with the consequences of this dispute.
The discussion about the verdict in Anklam, which was contested by the public prosecutor, shows how sensitive the issue of self-defense is in the German legal system. law forum points out that even a lack of evidence of an act of self-defense does not necessarily lead to a conviction, since the perpetrator's subjective knowledge of his defense situation is central.